The Whining Begins

If you thought the presidential campaign lasts too long, you can add to it the quadrennial whining from abroad, of which Simon Heffer seems to have the first sob:

I doubt we shall be much the wiser on Friday about who will be the next president of the United States, but we can be forgiven for expressing relief that this international spectator sport is now under way. Only 10 more months and it will be over.

Many Britons will feel it would be rather nice to have a vote, too. Well, maybe not a whole vote: I would settle for one worth 50 per cent of those cast by American citizens.

After all, since we are a strategic colony of the US, it would be nice to have even a marginal say in how the empire chooses to dispose our goodwill and our blood and treasure. Such considerations were explicit in the founding of the US, and what’s sauce for the goose…

Why should any of this matter to us? From this side of the Atlantic, most of the differences between the candidates seem to consist in how they would handle domestic policy – whether they would expand health care for the poor, or allow an amnesty for illegal immigrants, or how they would tackle America’s growing economic woes.

The last of those, of course, impacts upon us: the sub-prime loans crisis will long be used by Gordon Brown to excuse what in some part has been his own derelict economic management.

Yet in foreign affairs, and precisely because it is such a sensitive matter in America, the potential presidents are all sounding alarmingly similar…

We say to Mr. Heffer and all the others with the same plaint: kindly go get stuffed.

The reason the UK is a “strategic colony” of the U.S. is because of your own fecklessness in the 20th century. Is it our fault that Britain, once the workshop of the world, is now an innovative backwater? Is it our fault that the Royal Navy, which once ruled the waves, is now down to the Royal Yacht and a dinghy? Is it our fault your nation chose to spend all the money on a health system that now blames its patients if they get sick and will refuse to treat them?

The UK and Europe have made their choices. They exert no real power because that’s the path they traveled down. They’ve left it to the U.S. to spend the money and make the sacrifices to do the “hard power” things while they’ve let loose the tranzi “soft power” goo that makes our tasks that much harder. When did we get to vote on that?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Whining Begins

Who Were the Victims?

Details about the horrific Seattle killings have emerged:

Court documents said McEnroe, a store clerk, and Anderson, who is unemployed, told detectives they armed themselves on Christmas Eve and went to her parents’ home near Carnation, about 25 miles east of Seattle. There, they confronted Anderson’s parents, Wayne Anderson, 60, and Judy Anderson, 61, in their living room.

Michele Anderson told detectives her brother, a carpenter, owed her money she had loaned to him years earlier, and that she was upset with her parents because they did not take her side, documents say. She also said her parents were pressuring her to start paying rent for staying on their property, where she lived in a trailer with McEnroe.

“Michelle stated that she was tired of everybody stepping on her,” the court papers say. “She stated that she was upset with her parents and her brother and that if the problems did not get resolved on Dec. 24, then her intent was definitely to kill everybody.”

Satterberg said Michele Anderson fired once at her father’s head but missed. McEnroe stepped in, leveled his gun and fatally shot Wayne Anderson in the head, documents said.

Judy Anderson heard the shots and ran from the back room where she had been wrapping gifts. She was shot by McEnroe, who apologized to her before shooting her again, this time in the head, the court documents said.

Satterberg said that the two dragged the bodies to a shed behind the house, used towels and carpets to sop up blood stains and awaited the arrival of Anderson’s brother, Scott. He was due for a Christmas Eve visit with his wife, Erica, and children Olivia, 6, and Nathan, 3.

Her brother and sister-in-law put up a brave struggle, according to the documents. Scott Anderson charged her when she pulled out the gun, and was shot up to four times, records say

Michele then shot Erica Anderson twice, but she was able to crawl over the back of a couch to call 911, authorities said. McEnroe tolddetectives he tore the phone from Erica’s hands and destroyed it.

Huddling with her children, Erica Anderson pleaded with McEnroe not to shoot her, saying: “You don’t have to do this.”

“Yes, we do,” McEnroe was quoted as replying in the affidavit. He fired at her head, authorities said.

Satterberg said that McEnroe apologized to both of the children before he shot 6-year-old Olivia. He then turned to 3-year-old Nathan, who had picked up the batteries from the cordless phone his mother had used in her futile attempt to call for help, court documents said.

McEnroe than fired one last bullet through Nathan’s head, according to the affidavit. When asked why he shot Erica, Olivia and Nathan, McEnroe told detectives three times: “I didn’t want them to turn us in.”

Three generations wiped out. The last and youngest, a toddler bewildered at the slaughter surrounding him, had his brains blown out to ensure his silence.

Because we’re an advanced society, we no longer can grasp the concept of Evil in others:

[E]ven as they filed aggravated first-degree murder charges against McEnroe and Michele Anderson, prosecutors could not say what might have driven the couple in the violent killing spree.

“In the end, what motive could you find that would make sense of the senseless slaying of the Anderson family?” King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg said in announcing the charges.

McEnroe and Anderson will now go on trial. They will be represented by counsel, of course, and well they should. If they have none or if they can’t afford it, it will be provided for them, which is right and proper. The Law will be their tender and will not allow them to jeopardize their rights, which is only just.

If convicted on the six counts of aggravated first-degree murder, McEnroe and Anderson could face death sentences. If so, there will no doubt be automatic appeals, which there should be. These appeals will be lengthy; we will want the State to be careful about taking such an awesome step. During this time, bien pensants will continue to call the death penalty barbaric; perhaps they’re right.

The alternative sentence is life imprisonment without possibility of parole. In that case, McEnroe and Anderson will spend years and years behind bars. During this time, our sensibilities may change; the same bien pensants are already saying that imprisonment for life is cruel and unusual punishment (see also here).

Because we can’t acknowledge that anyone (except, perhaps, Bush and Cheney) are evil, that it must have been their environment or upbringing, slowly and inexorably the perpetrators will become the victims. Why, if sufficiently notorious, they could even have streets named after them and become honorary citizens in suitably progressive countries that look down their noses at us barbaric Americans.

Forgotten, of course, will be those they murdered. We won’t even remember their names, the memory of which will be as decayed as their bodies. News reports will focus on poor McEnroe and Anderson and the miseries of death row or a lifetime cell, saying in a graf much farther down that they “killed six people in a Christmas Eve spree.”

In being so solicitous of the murderers, the true victims will die a second time. And we will have killed them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Who Were the Victims?

More Artistic Oppression

Geez Louise, not only is the political oppression in this country causing anti-war movies to tank at the box office, it’s affected the stage as well:

The constitution and the ideals that once set the nation apart have been traded for fear of Muslims and immigrants, for CIA torture chambers, widening economic inequality, and a Congress still short on backbone.

Playwrights do write the kinds of plays that deal with such concerns, says Steven Drukman, whose “In This Corner” opens at the Old Globe next month. “But that work is not getting produced.”

Drukman, for instance, wrote his “Truth and Beauty” soon after the election that sent George W. Bush to the White House in 2000. “It was the election that spawned it,” he said. “It was one of those first drafts that came out fully formed.”

Calling the play a social comedy and like others of his “political, but not polemical,” he said the play had a workshop reading at South Coast Rep’s Pacific Playwrights Festival just before Sept. 11, 2001. No theater has done a full staging.

“There’s no one willing to face that sense of regret yet,” he said, referring to the Supreme Court-decided outcome of the 2000 election. “What would have happened if the election had turned out differently?”

The hero of “Truth and Beauty” edits a magazine he describes as “post-ideological.” His publication is Eyebrow and he feels “there’s not a dime’s worth of difference” between good ol’ boy, compassionate conservative George W. Bush and the rigid, Clinton-distancing Al Gore.

“We tend to forget that that’s how the media depicted the two candidates,” says Drukman. “No one wants to face how wrong that media image was.”

A few playwrights of a certain stature can get their obliquely political work produced, Drukman contends. The Intiman Theatre in Seattle and the Long Wharf Theatre in New Haven, for instance, staged Craig Lucas’ “Prayer for My Enemy” this year, both productions directed by the Intiman’s skilled, socially conscious Bartlett Sher.

But earlier conversations with playwrights Allan Havis here and Mac Wellman in New York confirmed that writers of even indirectly politically sensitive plays are being little produced. Producers may fear offending audiences – or merely reminding them of their current impotence as citizens.

In a note in the Long Wharf audience guide, Lucas wrote that he did not create “Prayer for My Enemy” to make a political point. “I have never once, in a long life of theatergoing, heard one single audience member say, you know, I think I’m going to vote for the other party because of what this play has showed me.”

Still, even more subtly than Christopher Shinn’s “Dying City” about the fallout from the Iraq and Vietnam wars, Lucas’ script uses the very private – and often comic – lives of his bumbling characters as a metaphor for the chaos we’re in and for the murderous deceptions that got us here.

I’m sure these plays are about as obliquely political and subtle as a brick to the skull. But if you don’t feel even that, it’s your fault:

Nothing has changed.

Perhaps that’s why the small outpouring of political plays earlier in the Bush administration and the Iraq War has slowed to a trickle. Locally, the trickle has dried up.

Nothing has changed for the better in nearly six years. The American people, New York Times columnist Frank Rich wrote recently, are in clinical depression.

Ah yes, that old psychic numbing: if you’re not bursting with anti-Bush rage like we are, then you’re nuts. And to show you just how bad it is, how did one of these agitprop pieces play on friendly ground?

Shinn’s play was at Lincoln Center last spring and Lucas’ at Long Wharf in the fall. On Broadway, not surprisingly, the only play that engaged the electorate’s most pressing issue – the war – closed at a loss in June. “Journey’s End,” a seminal war drama set in a dugout during World War I and seen in a moving, beautifully cast production, played to 24 percent capacity most weeks.

Remember, it’s the BushCo regime’s fault. Or your fault. Not their fault.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on More Artistic Oppression

Incredibly Mean-Spirited Rant Follows

Since I’m more or less conservative politically, it follows that I must not only be stupid but also greedy, hypocritical and committed to theocracy, social injustice and the suppression of wimmin-‘n’-minorities. The truth makes no difference: the narrative has already been written, the matter is settled.

With no good reputation to lose, I will exercise my extensive bastardliness on the subject of handicapped parking spaces. Not that they exist. Not on the people without handicapped placards who park there, who are already going to Hell without my help. And not on those with legitimate disabilities.

No, I’m talking about those with placards who park in handicapped spots who shouldn’t be parking there in the first place. Recently, at the supermarket we parked in a spot near (not in) the handicapped spaces. I waited in the car while my lovely bride went in. In the 20 or so minutes she was in the store, I watched as numerous people – yes, mostly with placarded vehicles – with no obvious disability parked and went into the store.

We’re not talking about the guy with the cane and we’re not talking about the elderly. We’re talking the bright young thing who leaped out and sashayed in. We’re talking about the driver who got out and left the handicapped passenger in the van while she went shopping.

Hey guys, the handicapped spots aren’t for the car, they’re for the handicapped person. Did you “borrow” the placard from your grandmother? You shouldn’t be parking there. Did you once have a disability like a knee replacement but are now recovered? You shouldn’t be parking there. Are you using a handicapped passenger as cover? You shouldn’t be parking there. In fact, I’ll be real mean spirited here and say if you don’t have a wheelchair, walker, cane, crutches, scooter or oxygen cylinder, you shouldn’t be parking there.

And all you morbidly obese folks? If you don’t have an associated heart problem, guess what? You shouldn’t be parking there. Walking will do you some good.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Incredibly Mean-Spirited Rant Follows

The Privileged Class

Offered without comment:

A state legislator claims he wasn’t invited to watch Auburn University battle the University of Alabama on Saturday in Jordan-Hare Stadium, so his game plan now is to invite Auburn to battle him in Montgomery County Circuit Court.

State Rep. Alvin Holmes, D-Montgomery, said as far as he can tell, Auburn gave two free tickets and a parking space for the game to every House and Senate member except him.

“If they aren’t going to give tickets to anyone, that’s fine,” Holmes said Tuesday. “But if you are going to give them to 35 senators and 104 House members and leave one House member out, that’s just not right.”

Holmes suspects the perceived slight is payback for a 2005 incident in which he helped lead the Legislative Black Caucus in calling for black athletes to boycott Auburn University after the school released two black administrators during a reorganization of the athletic department…

He said he called Auburn President Jay Gogue on Monday, and Gogue told him he would check into the issue and call Holmes back that afternoon.”

He never called me back,” Holmes said. “I called back today (Tuesday), and he didn’t call me back today, either.”

Holmes said he now believes if he is going to get any answers, it will have to be in court.

“I am going to file a lawsuit … for them to show cause why all the members of the Legislature seem to have been entitled to have two free tickets and a free parking space except me,” he said.

Holmes said he will consult with lawyers today to decide when to file his suit.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Privileged Class

The Benevolent Yanqui

I’m getting to this late, but there was a heartwarming story in the New York Times about the wonderful effect of the U.S. embargo on Cuba has had on the ecology of that country and the dangers of it ending:

Through accidents of geography and history, Cuba is a priceless ecological resource…

Cuba, by far the region’s largest island, sits at the confluence of the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Its mountains, forests, swamps, coasts and marine areas are rich in plants and animals, some seen nowhere else.

Cuba has not been free of development, including Soviet-style top-down agricultural and mining operations and, in recent years, an expansion of tourism. But it also has an abundance of landscapes that elsewhere in the region have been ripped up, paved over, poisoned or otherwise destroyed in the decades since the Cuban revolution, when development has been most intense. Once the embargo ends, the island could face a flood of investors from the United States and elsewhere, eager to exploit those landscapes…

See, all those U.S. administrations that maintained the embargo weren’t raving anti-Communist loonies, but sensitive Gaia-worshippers avant le lettre. But danger lurks!

[M]any scientists are… worried about what will become of it after Fidel Castro and his associates leave power and, as is widely anticipated, the American government relaxes or ends its trade embargo…

Oliver Houck, a professor of environmental law at Tulane University Law School, points out the dangers…

“[A]n invasion of U.S. consumerism, a U.S.-dominated future, could roll over it like a bulldozer” when the embargo ends.

Can’t win, can we? Embargo, bad. Ending embargo, bad. But environmental laws are being drafted for the onslaught of cud-chewing, baseball-cap-wearing, WalMart-shopping flyover sheeple. Will they work?

Mr. [Orlando] Rey [a Cuban lawyer and government functionary] said in the interview that Cubans must be encouraged to use their environmental laws. By “some kind of cultural habit,” he said, people in Cuba rarely turn to the courts to challenge decisions they dislike.

Maybe the cultural habit of getting tossed into prison for challenging the Castro regime?

Well, the formula seems to be (no tourism) + (no trade) = (ecological bliss). However, (no tourism) + (no trade) = (extreme poverty). Hmm, therefore does (ecological bliss) = (extreme poverty)? Better ask the former Vice President of these United States before he jets off to another lucrative engagement talking about the sins of his compatriots.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Benevolent Yanqui

Dancing With the One That Brought You

In 1971, the Ormandy recording of the Beethoven Ninth opened my eyes to the power and beauty of classical music. When CDs came out, I acquired two Karajan recordings, the 1983 and subsequently the 1977. Now there’s no question that Karajan is the better Beethoven interpreter, but I also cooled on the Ninth as a piece of music. Strangely enough, when I reacquired the Ormandy on CD (the recording, as far as I know, has never been out of print), I fell in love with it once again.

I’ve found that this phenomenon occurring time and again. There may be better recordings available, but somehow the first one heard remains the favorite. There’s no explanation or, sometimes, no excuse.

Through regular re-issues, sometimes from downloads, sometimes through painstaking searches around the globe, there are a good number of “first-heard” recordings that I’ve been particularly delighted to find, mostly because I thought they would never again see the light of day or would have to be acquired only as a very small part of a gigantic set:

Auber: Overture to “Marco Spada” (Bonynge – New Philharmonia)

Bach: Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor (Ormandy – Philadelphia Orchestra)

Bruckner: 2nd Symphony (Stein – Vienna Philharmonic)

Bruckner: 8th Symphony (Solti – Vienna Philharmonic)

Bruckner: 9th Symphony (Schuricht – Vienna Philharmonic)

Goldmark: Overture, “In Spring” (Fiedler – Boston Pops)

Grison: Toccata in F (Jane Parker-Smith)

Handel: Overture to “Radamisto” (Bonynge – English Chamber Orchestra)

Haydn: Symphony No. 100 (Scherchen – Vienna State Opera Orchestra)

Liszt: Grand Galop Chromatique (György Cziffra)

Mahler: 2nd Symphony (Ormandy – Philadelphia Orchestra)

Penderecki: Utrenja (Ormandy – Philadelphia Orchestra)

Prokofiev: Alexander Nevsky (Schippers – New York Philharmonic)

Rodgers: Guadalcanal March (Boult – London Philharmonic)

Schubert: 4th and 6th Symphonies (Maazel – Berlin Philharmonic)

Schumann: Suleika’s Song (Edith Mathis)

Sibelius: Spring Song (Groves – Royal Liverpool Philharmonic)

Tchaikovsky: 4th Symphony (Barenboim – New York Philharmonic)

Vaughan Williams: 4th Symphony (Bernstein – New York Philharmonic)

Wagner: Tannhäuser (Konwitschny – Berlin State Opera Orchestra)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Dancing With the One That Brought You

Gratuitous Dog Caricatures

We also have a number of original caricatures drawn by the one and only Mike McCartney. McCartney is famous in the dog world for his original and very amusing artwork. Appearing frequently at shows, Mike will turn out a spot-on cartoon of your dog, basing it on its name, show name or characteristics.

MBIS, MBISS Ch. Soyara’s Chantilly Lace JC

Ch. Soyara’s Titan of Blackmoor JC (a.k.a. “The Wonder Pup”)

Ch. Soyara’s Singer of Songs

Ch. Soyara’s Southern Belle

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gratuitous Dog Caricatures

Gratuitous Dog Portrait

 

Artist John Thomas Barry poses with his charcoal portrait of our boy Sarge (Soyara’s Ace of Spades). Mr. Barry saw Sarge at the Bluegrass Cluster shows in Lexington in 2006 and raved over what a good-looking fellow he was. He took a number of photographs of Sarge and after a few months sent us this photograph. Needless to say, we purchased the portrait, which now hangs above the mantel in the dining room.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gratuitous Dog Portrait

Back Tomorrow

Errands this morning, cutting up and hauling off a tree in the yard this afternoon, computer issues this evening.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Back Tomorrow

Death of a Thousand Cuts

As though we didn’t have enough things to spend our money on in this house, unfortunately I’ve recently discovered several sites where I can download classical music MP3s. This helps out immeasurably with the “minority recording” problem, where I want to get a single piece without buying a two- or three-CD set.

Amazon’s isn’t specifically dedicated to classical music, but still has quite a bit of good stuff, a lot of it from EMI. Individual tracks can be downloaded usually for less than a dollar.

eClassical has an enormous range of composers (over 800) to choose from. It’s not the place I’d go for the Austro-German core repertoire, but as many of the recordings come from BIS the Scandanavian composers (Sibelius, Nielsen, Gade, Grieg, Alfvén, Stenhammar) are heavily represented and with works not available anywhere else. The price of individual tracks again is quite low.

Deutsche Grammophon has now opened up much of its enormous catalog for downloading. This is the place to go for the core repertoire performed by its finest interpreters. The cost of individual tracks is higher ($2-5), but the sampling rate is 320 kbps, much higher than the other two (100-250 kbps), leading to a higher-quality recording.

The cost of individual tracks is low enough not to mind much, except after you’re out $20 or $30! Now I don’t want anyone e-mailing me with other sites, or go suggest to the rest of the Universal Group (Decca and Philips) or Sony/BMG that they go and do likewise…

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Death of a Thousand Cuts

A Forgotten Master

None of the novels of James Gould Cozzens is now in print. More’s the pity, yet in an age of chick- and hen-lit and little minimalist novels with their one-sentence paragraphs about angst-riddled urban professionals, Cozzens’s work is out of place though not out of time.

Cozzens was born in 1903 to middle-class parents. His family lived on Staten Island and were firm Episcopalians, a religion that figures prominently in several novels. He was educated at the Kent School in Connecticut and was admitted to Harvard in 1922. Cozzens was rusticated after two years for failing to study and running up debts with both the school and local merchants. By this time he published his first novel, Confusion to good reviews but modest sales. Another book, the historical novel Michael Scarlett followed in 1925.

Cozzens tutored in Cuba and Europe for a couple of years, the foreign experience providing material for later books. Returning to America, he married a literary agent, Bernice Baumgartner on New Year’s Eve 1927. They set up house in New York, her income and experience providing Cozzens with the freedom and support to write two more novels, Cock Pit and The Son of Perdition.

With the 1931 S.S. San Pedro, about a ship lost at sea, Cozzens hit his stride as a mature novelist with an objective style free of sentimentality. Two years later, The Last Adam began Cozzens’s series of novels reflecting his fascination with men of professions, this about a Connecticut country doctor. It was also the first Cozzens novel to be made into a film, Doctor Bull starring Will Rogers.

Castaway of 1934 was Cozzens’s one and final attempt at an allegorical novel. He wrote a number of short stories which sold well to magazines, but he did not care for the form and felt he had no particular aptitude for it. Men and Brethren, about a New York Episcopal priest, appeared in 1936, followed by Ask Me Tomorrow in 1940.

Cozzens and his wife had moved to a farm near Lambertville, New Jersey in the early 1930’s with money from the proceeds of his book sales. The couple were not social; visitors to Carrs Farm were rare, no authors were entertained and Cozzens remained aloof from literary politics. He became increasing interested in the law, frequently visiting nearby Doylestown, Pennsylvania and the county court there; the 1942 novel The Just and the Unjust about a murder trial was the product.

Cozzens enlisted in the Army Air Corps in 1943 and spent the war years in a variety of writing positions, eventually with the Chief of Staff, Hap Arnold. Cozzens’s Air Corps years were a break with his usual reclusiveness. He kept a journal, but did no literary writing during that time.

He was discharged in 1945 with the rank of major and returned to his former life. His experience with the hierarchy of the Army gave him the inspiration for his next book, Guard of Honor, published in 1948. Though its sales were not extraordinary, this novel of 48 hours on a Florida air base is held to be possibly the great World War II novel and won Cozzens the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1949.

Up to now, Cozzens was recognized as a major American novelist, but one whose fame had not spread widely. His next novel, By Love Possessed, was to change that. Published in 1957 it became an immediate best-seller and held the Number 1 position for several months. The critical acclamation was such that Cozzens allowed himself to be interviewed for a Time cover story.

It was a major mistake. The usually ironic Cozzens came across in the story as a cranky reactionary, a bigot and a snob. The real blow to his reputation came in a 12-page article written by Dwight Macdonald in Commentary in 1958 which rubbished Cozzens’s writing style and world view. Macdonald was crass enough to send a copy of the article to Cozzens, whose reply was savage:

I see that you don’t understand prose structure very well; that shades of meaning in words are, like irony, altogether lost on you; and that your imperceptiveness is, for an educated adult, quite remarkable… I’m afraid your infirmity here makes me unable to take your “literary criticism” very seriously. You’d always, it seems safe to guess, be wrong. However, in the field of the philippic (sorry to send you to your dictionary again) I think you’re gifted. I haven’t in years had the pleasure of reading so refreshingly venomous an outburst. For that, at least, let me award you an earned A … and I’ll bet all those little-mag. people are just loving you to death.

Cozzens’s output slowed considerable after By Love Possessed, not because of the reaction among the literary elite, but because he found it more and more difficult to express himself fully. A collection of previously published short stories, Children and Others, appeared in 1964. Cozzens’s final novel, Morning, Noon and Night, came out in 1968 to dismal critical reaction and sales.

Cozzens was a borderline alcoholic. Alcohol gave him the relaxation to write and when on advice from his doctor he gave up drinking, he found himself no longer able to write. He and Bernice retired to Florida. He died in 1978; the New York newspapers were on strike at the time and his death went largely unnoticed, which would have struck Cozzens as highly amusing.

Cozzens’s characters are not from among the lower classes, though neither are they wealthy. He wrote about men as professionals – lawyers, doctors, ministers, businessmen – because such men succeeded by using their talents and not giving up. Duty is a very strong ethic among Cozzens’s characters. For example, Norman Ross in Guard of Honor, finds himself at a low point dealing with the various crises with which he’s been left:

Downheartedness was no man’s part. A man must stand up and do the best he can with what there is. If the thing he labored to uncover now seemed in danger of stultifying him, could a rational being find nothing to do? If mind failed you, seeing no pattern; and heart failed you, seeing no point, the stout, stubborn will must be up and doing. A pattern should be found; a point should be imposed. Was that too much?

An attitude which, needless to say, didn’t survive the 1960’s. Sitting down and bawling about Mom and Dad and suburbia and bounds on behavior became the new thing. No wonder Cozzens’s reputation sank so quickly.

Irving Howe sneered in The New Republic in 1958 that Cozzens was a spokesman for “a civilization that finds its symbolic embodiment in Dwight David Eisenhower and its practical guide in John Foster Dulles.” Considering that Eisenhower’s kind of civilization has survived and prospered and Howe’s has fallen into History’s dust, kept alive only by irrational anti-Americanism, I’d say there are worse insults.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Forgotten Master

Christmas Down Under

My lovely bride is in New Zealand for the holidays visiting with her mother, who’s celebrating her 80th birthday, while her poor husband sits abandoned and freezing at home. Here’s a picture of the family sitting down at dinner; she’s on the right, in the black top.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Christmas Down Under

A Dog’s Christmas

Near Bethlehem some time ago,
A flock of sheep was dwelling.
To shepherds, sheep, and sheep dog, too,
Angel choirs came telling.

Good news, not fear, to all the world,
A baby in a manger.
“We’d leave to see,” the shepherds said,
“But our sheep would be in danger.”

“To watch the flock, we’ll leave the dog,
While seeking mankind’s Savior.
The dog will guard and keep the sheep
From wandering behavior.”

Though disappointed not to go
To Bethlehem’s blest stable,
The dog felt duty-bound to work
As well as it was able.

The shepherds came at last and praised
God for Christ revealing,
Too wonder-struck to praise the dog
That gave them time for kneeling.

But God Himself spoke to the dog
In tones for canine hearing.
His words inspired all dogs to serve
For ages persevering:

“Good and faithful servant, well done.”

Kent Dannen

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Dog’s Christmas

The Bee in Their Bonnet

Dog News recently had another one of their periodic complaints about “cheap champions,” or unworthy dogs receiving championships (no link available). As usual, the editors bemoaned the fact that in the U.S. any dog can get its championship if it’s shown enough, there are too many shows, dogs can finish without defeating another dog of its sex, or could finish by beating its littermates, and so on.

I’ve found all this griping tedious. What evidence is there that dogs finish at a greater rate than they did thirty years ago? Point schedules, as I understand it, are set so that there will be majors at about 20% of shows in a region. Thus dogs don’t have any greater opportunity to get their majors then they always have.

And, come on: what percentage of dogs finish without defeating another dog of its sex or using its littermates as point fodder? What would the editors suggest as a change? That a dog has to defeat specials before finishing? Then exhibitors will be bringing out every tired old veteran who should be dozing on a sofa somewhere.

These comments are wrong-headed as well. It blames the exhibitors and the structure of the show instead of placing it where it belongs, on the judges. A judge isn’t judging a dog against the others in the ring, he’s judging based on how well the dog comes up to the breed standard. Dogs not worthy of becoming champions shouldn’t be awarded points toward their championships. In every judge’s book for every breed that has class exhibits, there’s a little box that says “Winners Withheld.” If they check that box and don’t give points that day, the AKC will back them up to the hilt. However for a judge to do that would require courage. And a thorough knowledge of the breed. Can’t have that!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Bee in Their Bonnet